This paper defends a principle I call Equal Treatment, according to which the rationality of a
belief is determined in precisely the same way as the rationality of any other state. For …

It is plausible that there is a distinctively epistemic standard of correctness for belief. It is also
plausible that there is a range of practical reasons bearing on belief. These theses are often …

Some prominent evidentialists argue that practical considerations cannot be normative
reasons for belief because they can't be motivating reasons for belief. Existing pragmatist …

Is there a distinctively epistemic kind of blame? It has become commonplace for
epistemologists to talk about epistemic blame, and to rely on this notion for theoretical …

Normativism in the theory of meaning and content is the view that linguistic meaning and/or
intentional content are essentially normative. As both normativity and its essentiality to …

The recently influential “reasons-first” approach to normativity says that reasons are the
fundamental elements of the normative domain, and that all other normative facts …

This paper proposes that the question “What should I believe?” is to be answered in the
same way as the question “What should I do?,” a view I call Equal Treatment. After clarifying …

Names: Hannon, Michael (Michael J.), editor.| Ridder, Jeroen de, editor. Title: The
Routledge handbook of political epistemology/Edited by Michael Hannon and Jeroen de …

Belief, some say, is normative. To say this is to say, not only that beliefs are subject to
normative standards or principles, but that it is part of the essence of belief to be subject to …

In Knowing Science, Alexander Bird presents an epistemology of science that rejects
empiricism and gives a central place to the concept of knowledge. Science aims at …