Objective: The present study, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review
and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of …

The cross-cultural validity of feigning instruments and cut-scores is a critical concern for
forensic mental health clinicians. This systematic review evaluated feigning classification …

Immigration trends are rapidly increasing the diversity present in individuals who require
psychological evaluation. Forensic psychologists in particular are often faced with …

Objective: To cross-validate the Dot Counting Test in a large neuropsychological sample.
Method: Dot Counting Test scores were compared in credible (n= 142) and non-credible (n …

The current study provides specificity data on a large sample (n= 115) of young to middle-
aged, male, monolingual Spanish speakers of lower educational level and low acculturation …

Cognitive efforts tests, such as the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM; Tombaugh, 1997),
are widely used internationally, yet there is a dearth of research that has assessed the utility …

Objective: To measure specificity as failure rates for non-clinical, bilingual, Mexican
Americans on three popular performance validity measures:(a) the language format Reliable …

Introduction: Cognitive efforts tests, such as the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), are
widely used internationally, yet emerging research suggests that performance on the TOMM …

Objective: This study cross-validated the Dot Counting Test (DCT) as a performance validity
test (PVT) among a mixed clinical veteran sample. Completion time and error patterns also …

While literature on performance validity tests (PVTs) in neuropsychological assessment has
examined memory-based paradigms, other research has suggested that tests of attention …