Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clini... : Current Opinion in
Urology Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice …

Objectives We evaluated how the changes in Gleason grading affected the long-term
outcomes of a large prostatectomy cohort. Methods We obtained long-term follow-up (16.7 …

Background The oncological risks after benign histology on a transurethral resection of the
prostate (TURP) remain largely unknown. Here, the risk of prostate cancer incidence and …

Nearly five decades following its conception, the Gleason grading system remains a
cornerstone in the prognostication and management of patients with prostate cancer. In the …

Background The risk of missing prostate cancer in the transrectal ultrasound-guided
systematic biopsies of the prostate in men with suspected prostate cancer is a key problem …

Purpose Prostate biopsy histopathology and immunohistochemistry are important in the
differential diagnosis of the disease and can be used to assess the degree of prostate …

Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate nationwide survival outcomes in men
with localized prostate cancer managed on active surveillance. Materials and Methods: A …

Objectives: To report oncological outcomes including biochemical recurrence (BR) following
radical prostatectomy (RP) from a large consecutive cohort operated in an 18-year period …

Background The Gleason grading system is a major tool used for prediction of prostate
cancer (PCa) behavior. Because of heterogeneity and sampling errors, prognosis is variable …

Background Active surveillance (AS) and radical prostatectomy (RP) are both accepted
treatments for men with favorable-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa)(ie, clinical tumor …