The jurisprudential evolution of evidence law is dead. At least, that's what we're expected to
believe. After all, it's been forty-seven years since the common law pedigree of evidence law …

The Supreme Court maintains self-regulatory rules that have fluctuated over time, and each
change affects the nature of the Court itself. Many of these rules are well-known: the rule of …

The political convulsions of the past decade have fueled acute interest in constitutional
norms. Also known as" conventions" or" customs," constitu-tional norms are common and …

A recent amendment to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court has drawn
unprecedented attention to the war crime of starvation of civilians as a method of wafare. It …

The United States suffers from a gender power gap. Several important leadership firsts
followed women's suffrage in 1920: 2 the first woman governor (1925), 3 the first woman …

In recent decades, we have witnessed the diminution of the impeachment process by
various actors especially political parties. But the Founders envisioned a vastly different …

Supposedly at a time of originalism,'a different kind of history has spread across
constitutional law. In just the last few years, important constitutional decisions from the …

The doctrine of stare decisis famousy instructs judges to respect past decisions even if they
believe these decisions are wrong. Many believe stare decisis serves venerable values and …

Contending with national emergencies that develop into transnational catastrophes gives
rise inevitably to concerns raised by libertarians and utilitarians over the extent to which the …

The role of the federal courts is to" say what the law is, not what the law should be." 1 So
said Justice Kavanaugh in 2016. He is hardly the first to say something of this sort. Many …