A central premise of the procedural justice literature—based on studies conducted mainly in
the United States—is that people react unfavorably when they have little voice in a decision …

Research shows that employees can have process control, decision control, or both, over
work outcomes. Process control refers to the extent to which workers have a chance to …

The most generally accepted and best documented manipulation in procedural justice
experiments is varying whether or not participants are allowed an opportunity to voice their …

Examined the effects of" voice"(participating in allocation decision making by expressing
one's own opinion about the preferred allocation) on responses to an inequitable allocation …

Abstract 179 undergraduates took part in a study of the effects of instrumental and
noninstrumental participation on distributive and procedural fairness judgments. In a goal …

Considerable research has demonstrated that fair procedures help improve reactions to
decisions, a phenomenon known as the fair process effect. However, in the present …

Many voice studies have failed to distinguish among voice opportunity, perceived voice
opportunity, voice behavior, and voice instrumentality. Thus, the authors sought to clarify the …

The most generally accepted and best documented manipulation in procedural justice
experiments is varying whether participants are allowed an opportunity to voice their opinion …

In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature
of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making …

Distributive justice (outcome fairness) was distinguished from procedural justice (fairness of
the processes whereby outcomes are allocated). 80 6th-grade boys, tested individually …