Applicability of care quality indicators for women with low-risk pregnancies planning hospital birth: a retrospective study of medical records
K Ueda, T Sado, Y Takahashi, T Igarashi… - Scientific Reports, 2020 - nature.com
K Ueda, T Sado, Y Takahashi, T Igarashi, T Nakayama
Scientific Reports, 2020•nature.comPractices for planned birth among women with low-risk pregnancies vary by birth setting,
medical professional, and organizational system. Appropriate monitoring is essential for
quality improvement. Although sets of quality indicators have been developed, their
applicability has not been tested. To improve the quality of childbirth care for low-risk
mothers and infants in Japanese hospitals, we developed 35 quality indicators using
existing clinical guidelines and quality indicators. We retrospectively analysed data for 347 …
medical professional, and organizational system. Appropriate monitoring is essential for
quality improvement. Although sets of quality indicators have been developed, their
applicability has not been tested. To improve the quality of childbirth care for low-risk
mothers and infants in Japanese hospitals, we developed 35 quality indicators using
existing clinical guidelines and quality indicators. We retrospectively analysed data for 347 …
Abstract
Practices for planned birth among women with low-risk pregnancies vary by birth setting, medical professional, and organizational system. Appropriate monitoring is essential for quality improvement. Although sets of quality indicators have been developed, their applicability has not been tested. To improve the quality of childbirth care for low-risk mothers and infants in Japanese hospitals, we developed 35 quality indicators using existing clinical guidelines and quality indicators. We retrospectively analysed data for 347 women in Japan diagnosed with low-risk pregnancy in the second trimester, admitted between April 2015 and March 2016. We obtained scores for 35 quality indicators and evaluated their applicability, i.e., feasibility, improvement potential, and reliability (intra- and inter-rater reliability: kappa score, positive and negative agreement). The range of adherence to each indicator was 0–95.7%. We identified feasibility concerns for six indicators with over 25% missing data. Two indicators with over 90% adherence showed limited potential for improvement. Three indicators had poor kappa scores for intra-rater reliability, with positive/negative agreement scores 0.94/0.33, 0.33/0.95, and 0.00/0.97, respectively. Two indicators had poor kappa scores for inter-rater reliability, with positive/negative agreement scores 0.25/0.92 and 0.68/0.61, respectively. The findings indicated that these 35 care quality indicators for low-risk pregnant women may be applicable to real-world practice, with some caveats.
nature.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果