Iron removal, energy consumption and operating cost of electrocoagulation of drinking water using a new flow column reactor
KS Hashim, A Shaw, R Al Khaddar, MO Pedrola… - Journal of environmental …, 2017 - Elsevier
KS Hashim, A Shaw, R Al Khaddar, MO Pedrola, D Phipps
Journal of environmental management, 2017•ElsevierThe goal of this project was to remove iron from drinking water using a new
electrocoagulation (EC) cell. In this research, a flow column has been employed in the
designing of a new electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) to achieve the planned target. Where,
the water being treated flows through the perforated disc electrodes, thereby effectively
mixing and aerating the water being treated. As a result, the stirring and aerating devices
that until now have been widely used in the electrocoagulation reactors are unnecessary …
electrocoagulation (EC) cell. In this research, a flow column has been employed in the
designing of a new electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) to achieve the planned target. Where,
the water being treated flows through the perforated disc electrodes, thereby effectively
mixing and aerating the water being treated. As a result, the stirring and aerating devices
that until now have been widely used in the electrocoagulation reactors are unnecessary …
The goal of this project was to remove iron from drinking water using a new electrocoagulation (EC) cell. In this research, a flow column has been employed in the designing of a new electrocoagulation reactor (FCER) to achieve the planned target. Where, the water being treated flows through the perforated disc electrodes, thereby effectively mixing and aerating the water being treated. As a result, the stirring and aerating devices that until now have been widely used in the electrocoagulation reactors are unnecessary. The obtained results indicated that FCER reduced the iron concentration from 20 to 0.3 mg/L within 20 min of electrolysis at initial pH of 6, inter-electrode distance (ID) of 5 mm, current density (CD) of 1.5 mA/cm 2, and minimum operating cost of 0.22 US $/m 3. Additionally, it was found that FCER produces H 2 gas enough to generate energy of 10.14 kW/m 3. Statistically, it was found that the relationship between iron removal and operating parameters could be modelled with R 2 of 0.86, and the influence of operating parameters on iron removal followed the order: C 0> t> CD> pH. Finally, the SEM (scanning electron microscopy) images showed a large number of irregularities on the surface of anode due to the generation of aluminium hydroxides.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果