meta-analysis: antibiotics for prophylaxis against hemodialysis catheter–related infections

MT James, J Conley, M Tonelli, BJ Manns… - Annals of internal …, 2008 - acpjournals.org
MT James, J Conley, M Tonelli, BJ Manns, J MacRae, BR Hemmelgarn
Annals of internal medicine, 2008acpjournals.org
Background: Catheter-related infections cause morbidity and mortality in patients
undergoing hemodialysis. Purpose: To examine whether topical or intraluminal antibiotics
reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection compared with no antibiotic therapy in adults
undergoing hemodialysis. Data Sources: Electronic databases, trial registries,
bibliographies, and conference proceedings up to October 2007, with no language
restrictions. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently selected randomized, controlled …
Background
Catheter-related infections cause morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Purpose
To examine whether topical or intraluminal antibiotics reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection compared with no antibiotic therapy in adults undergoing hemodialysis.
Data Sources
Electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and conference proceedings up to October 2007, with no language restrictions.
Study Selection
Two reviewers independently selected randomized, controlled trials using topical or intraluminal antibiotics for prophylaxis of infection in adults with catheters who are undergoing hemodialysis.
Data Extraction
Two independent reviewers assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and extracted data.
Data Synthesis
Fixed-effects models were used to estimate pooled rate ratios for outcomes. Topical antibiotics reduced the rate of bacteremia (rate ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.40]; 0.10 vs. 0.45 case of bacteremia per 100 catheter-days), exit-site infection (rate ratio, 0.17 [CI, 0.08 to 0.38]; 0.06 vs. 0.41 case of infection per 100 catheter-days), need for catheter removal, and hospitalization for infection. Intraluminal antibiotics reduced the rate of bacteremia (rate ratio, 0.32 [CI, 0.22 to 0.47]; 0.12 vs. 0.32 case of bacteremia per 100 catheter-days) and need for catheter removal. Intraluminal antibiotics did not significantly reduce the rate of exit-site infection, and no hospitalization data were available for these agents.
Limitations
The evidence base included only 16 trials, and most had less than 6 months of follow-up. Only one third of studies were blinded. Publication bias was evident.
Conclusion
Both topical and intraluminal antibiotics reduced the rate of bacteremia as well as the need for catheter removal secondary to complications. Whether these strategies will lead to antimicrobial resistance and loss of efficacy over longer periods remains unclear.
acpjournals.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果