Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds

I Palomo, Y Dujardin, E Midler… - Proceedings of the …, 2019 - National Acad Sciences
I Palomo, Y Dujardin, E Midler, M Robin, MJ Sanz, U Pascual
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019National Acad Sciences
The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+)
is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries.
REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and
increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the
conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds
distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets …
The program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is one of the major attempts to tackle climate change mitigation in developing countries. REDD+ seeks to provide result-based incentives to promote emission reductions and increase carbon sinks in forest land while promoting other cobenefits, such as the conservation of biodiversity. We model different scenarios of international REDD+ funds distribution toward potential recipient countries using 2 carbon emission reduction targets (20% and 50% compared to the baseline scenario, i.e., deforestation and forest degradation without REDD+) by 2030. The model combines the prioritization of environmental outcomes in terms of carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation and social equity, accounting for the equitable distribution of international REDD+ funds. Results highlight the synergy between carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation under alternative fund allocation criteria, especially for scenarios of low carbon emission reduction. Trade-offs increase when distributional equity is considered as an additional criterion, especially under higher equity requirements. The analysis helps to better understand the inherent trade-offs between enhancing distributional equity and meeting environmental targets under alternative REDD+ fund allocation options.
National Acad Sciences
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果

安装“学术搜索”按钮,即可在浏览网页的同时查找论文。

Google学术搜索按钮
https://www.example.edu/paper.pdf
[PDF]引用

Bibliography

  1. Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, 1935, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”, Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780.