Sacubitril/valsartan improves autonomic function and cardiopulmonary parameters in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

F Giallauria, G Vitale, M Pacileo, A Di Lorenzo… - Journal of Clinical …, 2020 - mdpi.com
F Giallauria, G Vitale, M Pacileo, A Di Lorenzo, A Oliviero, F Passaro, R Calce, A Parlato
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020mdpi.com
Background: Heart rate recovery (HRR) is a marker of vagal tone, which is a powerful
predictor of mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a
treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), which impressively impacts
cardiovascular outcome. This study aims at evaluating the effects of S/V on HRR and its
correlation with cardiopulmonary indexes in HFrEF patients. Methods: Patients with HFrEF
admitted to outpatients' services were screened out for study inclusion. S/V was …
Background
Heart rate recovery (HRR) is a marker of vagal tone, which is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), which impressively impacts cardiovascular outcome. This study aims at evaluating the effects of S/V on HRR and its correlation with cardiopulmonary indexes in HFrEF patients.
Methods
Patients with HFrEF admitted to outpatients’ services were screened out for study inclusion. S/V was administered according to guidelines. Up-titration was performed every 4 weeks when tolerated. All patients underwent laboratory measurements, Doppler-echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing (CPET) at baseline and at 12-month follow-up.
Results
Study population consisted of 134 HFrEF patients (87% male, mean age 57.9 ± 9.6 years). At 12-month follow-up, significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 28% ± 5.8% to 31.8% ± 7.3%, p < 0.0001), peak exercise oxygen consumption (VO2peak) (from 15.3 ± 3.7 to 17.8 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min, p < 0.0001), the slope of increase in ventilation over carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2 slope )(from 33.4 ± 6.2 to 30.3 ± 6.5, p < 0.0001), and HRR (from 11.4 ± 9.5 to 17.4 ± 15.1 bpm, p = 0.004) was observed. Changes in HRR were significantly correlated to changes in VE/VCO2slope (r = −0.330; p = 0.003). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, multivariate analysis showed that changes in HRR were significantly associated to changes in VE/VCO2slope (Beta (B) = −0.975, standard error (SE) = 0.364, standardized Beta coefficient (Bstd) = −0.304, p = 0.009). S/V showed significant reduction in exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) detection at CPET (28 EOV detected at baseline CPET vs. 9 EOV detected at 12-month follow-up, p < 0.001). HRR at baseline CPET was a significant predictor of EOV at 12-month follow-up (B = −2.065, SE = 0.354, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In HFrEF patients, S/V therapy improves autonomic function, functional capacity, and ventilation. Whether these findings might translate into beneficial effects on prognosis and outcome remains to be elucidated.
MDPI
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果